Search This Blog

Friday, May 31, 2013

Islamophobia Comes to Canberra

This post was first published by the Gatestone Institute.  See:
Are we to let our freedoms be shaped by the worst kind of intolerance found in the sharia badlands? How will discrimination among religions based on fear distort human rights?
Like student magazines all over the world, Woroni, put out by students at the Australian National University, publishes satire. It did when I attended 30 years ago, and it still does today. Much of what is written is offensive to someone or other, but it is a rare day when the university pays any attention.

However last week, The Australian newspaper reported that university authorities responded to a complaint by international students to compel Woroni "to pulp a satirical infographic which described a passage from the Koran as a 'rape fantasy'".  Rachel Baxendale wrote:
The University also threatened student authors and editors of the infographic with disciplinary action, including academic exclusion and the withdrawal of the publication's funding.
The piece was a fifth in a satirical series entitled "Advice from Religions" which had previously discussed Catholicism, Scientology, Mormonism and Judaism.
No complaints were received about any of the earlier installments.
The university issued a statement that:
… the infographic breached university rules and Australian Press Council guidelines, as well as posing a threat to the ANU's reputation and security.
"In a world of social media, (there is) potential for material such as the article in question to gain attention and traction in the broader world and potentially harm the interests of the university and the university community," the statement said.
The university cited an ugly demonstration by Muslims which took place in Sydney on September 15, 2012, and the Jyllands-Posten cartoon controversy.

The Sydney demonstration involved protestors displaying placards such as "Behead all those who insult the prophet" and "Sharia will dominate the world."

Baxendale reported that one of the Woroni editors was told by a complainant: "I don't think you understand the seriousness of this. In Pakistan, people get shot for this kind of thing."

This logic is terrifying. People can get shot for many things in Pakistan: for gay sex or for belonging to the wrong Muslim sect. Are we in Australia to let our freedoms be shaped by the worst kinds of intolerance found in the sharia badlands?

The Australian National University was motivated by raw fear -- of Islam. They virtually admitted as much. They did not bat an eyelid when diverse religions were mocked week after week in the pages of Woroni, but Islam is different. It seems the university did not even go through the motions of pretending they were acting to protect Muslims: they just didn't want to get hurt.

This is a real example of true Islamophobia, in which an individual or organization discriminates between religions on the basis of the degree to which they fear Islam. The Australian National University has shown itself to be genuinely Islamophobic, yet at the same time, sharia-friendly.

This is the surrender of fear, which aligns with Muhammad's call to non-Muslims to aslim taslam: "Surrender and you will be safe." The Australian National University has acted to secure its safety, but at a great price.

This university could dig deeper and consider two implications of their actions.

One is: Why is it they have such fear of Islam? Do their actions show that they agree with Geert Wilders that "Islam is the problem"? Do they agree that it is Islam's own theological characteristics that have caused Australia's leading university to threaten its students with expulsion, simply for doing what students have always done?

The second question is: How will discrimination among religions based upon the criterion of fear distort human rights and the very fabric of the society in which we live? Are we to bow down before Islamic dogmas in every domain of life, out of the fear of being shot "as in Pakistan"? Will the demands of Islamic sharia determine the boundaries of human safety in every corner of the globe, as the September 2012 Sydney protestors so brazenly demanded?
Mark Durie is an Anglican vicar in Melbourne, Australia, author of The Third Choice, and an Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum.


  1. I did see this article in The Australian and I wrote to the 2 chancellor's involved expressing my concern about them threatening the students involved with academic withdrawal for merely speaking unpalatable truths about Islam. However, I received no response.

  2. Very interesting article. What has happened to free speech in Australia? This is not the Middle East. However why do I feel aprehensive about putting my name to this mild comment?

  3. Hi Mark

    The complainant who was reported to have told the Woroni editor "you could get shot for that sort of thing in Pakistan" was the Student Officer of the Muslim dominated and led International Students Association, Muhammad Taufiq bin Suraidi ('Taufiq'). Its amazing he wasn't called on that and asked to explain what he meant as it could be interpreted as a threat. Why the Woroni editor didn't point out that we are not in Pakistan and in Australia NOBODY is killed for saying anything about any religion is a mystery. ANU is my old uni ('77) and I worked on Woroni too - it beggars belief that Woroni kowtowed to that threat but that the Chancellery also got involved as it did itself threatening punitive measures if the editors of Woroni didn't comply! I was staggered to read about this. In the ANU of old such an intervention would never had occurred and if it had, the Chancellor's offices would have been occupied by belligerent students (they did so at the time with far less provocation). It shows just how far we have sunk in making constant apologies and excuses for Islam. In doing so we are tolerating the intolerant and I fear the very freedoms we take for granted will be under even great threat from within.

  4. International students, who travel to study away from home, should expect to be exposed to the culture of the country they traveled to study in. They are not supposed to attempt to subjugate their hosts to their own home culture.
    I believe, if our universities fail to understand their roll in promoting the Western culture, especially the values of freedom and human rights, to their oversees students, they have failed to educate those international students. Instead, they have accepted their payment in return for lending them the platform of Australia's highest education institutes to promote their own home culture.


Comments are moderated. Avoid profanities or foul language. Stay on topic. Avoid ad hominem attacks. Posts which violate these principles or are deemed offensive in any way will be deleted.